We’re giving away a limited edition Modern Warfare 2 Xbox 360 bundle!
We are kicking off our holiday giveaways with a bang! We’ve teamed with our friends at shoot it! to bring you this Modern Warfare 2 Xbox 360 limited edition console, a $400 value. The bundle includes a custom Xbox 360 console with exclusive design, a 250GB Xbox 360 hard drive, Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2, a pair of black controllers, and more. It hits stores on November 10th, and we’ve pre-ordered one that we’re giving away to one of you. Be sure to check out the giveaway rules to see how to enter!
Monday November 24, 2008 6:32 pm
The Bush Legacy
Posted by Charles Mitri Categories: Business, Domestic Policy, Editorials, Foreign Policy, Foreign Relations, History, US Economy, Wall Street, War

When George W. Bush vacates the White House on January 20, 2009, the floodgates will open, as political pundits line up to take pot shots at his eight years as Chief Executive.
Presidential rankings are nothing new. Every former president has one and have eschewed the usual practice of getting an objective view of a president’s legacy after leaving office. These days, the Internet and instant readers’ polls have made the tried and true method of waiting a few years for a ranking virtually obsolete.
Down to business. America’s best presidents are a very elite group, usually judged by how well they react during a crisis. At the top of the heap there are Lincoln, FDR, Washington, Jefferson, Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. Over the last few years there’s been a shift in rankings at the bottom of the barrel. Grant and Harding used to occupy the number one and two slots. Over recent years, James Buchanan has assumed the bottom spot with Herbert Hoover right on his heels. Buchanan gets the blame for the Civil War. Hoover is charged with the 1929 stock market crash and onset of the Great Depression two years later.
To paraphrase Ricky Ricardo there will be lot of splainin’ to do once the Bush administration leaves office. What follows is an hypothesis on Bush’s eventual ranking and supporting reasons.
1) 9/11: While no evidence has surfaced that 9/11 was part of a conspiracy to give Bush the grounds to start full scale military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, doubts still abound that Bush reacted quickly enough to halt the attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center. The Patriot Act, giving the president unwieldy power and how Bush used that power, usually gets the blame for ignoring constitutional rights and the Guantanamo Bay fiasco. Bush’s sluggish response to deploy FEMA in the wake of Hurricane Katrina only adds fuel to the fire. Many lawmakers were sufficiently displeased to ask if the president would respond in the same manner with a terrorist attack.
2) General costs of living: Gas prices peaked at $4.00 a gallon before consumer demand took a nosedive. Soaring gas prices also led to higher prices at supermarket checkout counters - store owners and food distributors had to charge more to transport goods. As a result, most Americans were forced to choose between heating their homes and buying food. Was Bush paying off Texas oil barons who financed his election campaigns? Again there is no evidence to support the accusation, but eventually the truth will be known.
3) Outsourcing: This proved to be one of the most disastrous decisions of the Bush administration. The president claimed that outsourcing was good for business and the economy. How? Not only did it take jobs out of the country, forcing unemployment to rise, but it also added insult to injury when companies got tax breaks while firing American employees. Outsourcing can also be linked to any number of recent fiascoes - the mortgage crisis, the Wall Street meltdown, and the bank crisis. Its simple economics. If people aren’t working, they can’t pay their bills, can’t afford their homes, can’t look for work and destroys their credit rating.
4) Foreign policy: If reports are accurate, George H.W. Bush warned his son against going into Iraq, saying that he’d never be able to get out. So what happened? The younger Bush invaded anyway and then had the audacity to claim that the next president would inherit the Iraqi conflict. In the process, violence escalated in Afghanistan and America alienated many of its European allies. The real coup de grace was - and is - the cost of maintaining a military presence in Iraq- - $10 to $20 billion a month in tax revenues.
Overall ranking
While the current recession and unemployment rates aren’t at Depression era levels, they’re bad enough to give Hoover a run for his money. 9/11 and the Patriot Act ushered in what some would compare to fascism. The rising cost of living and all its baggage, made life unbearable for most Americans. The Iraqi police action - only Congress can declare war - and subsequent alienation of European allies besmirched America’s reputation abroad. Little wonder that Bush’s approval rating dropped to 19%. To put that into perspective, Harry Truman left office with a 32% approval rating, followed by Nixon at 28%. Best guess scenario is that Bush will eventually overtake Hoover’s spot for the second worst president in our nation’s history.
- Related Tags:
- 9/11, abraham lincoln, civil war, congress, cost of living, depression, fdr, george w. bush, george washington, iraq, james buchannan, outsourcing, president rankings, thomas jefferson
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
© Gear Live Media, LLC. 2007 – User-posted content, unless source is quoted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Public Domain License. Gear Live graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, videos, articles, blogs, forums, scripts and other service names are the trademarks of Gear Live Inc.


Digg This























Comments:
“While no evidence has surfaced that 9/11 was part of a conspiracy”
check out architects and engineers for 9/11 truth at ae911truth(dot)org. Also check out PatriotsQuestion911(dot)com, which includes many ex-military and intelligence. Go to Google Video and watch the films “9/11 Press for Truth” and “Improbable Collapse.” Then tell me there’s no evidence pointing to an inside job.
Reply to this: comment | thread
No evidence? Honestly, it is overwhelming. Take 20min and look at it, start here: Rivers of molten metal flowing like lava at the base of 1, 2 and 7. Just explain that.
Reply to this: comment | thread
Dear Adam,
Point taken. There is a wealth of scientific evidence given by engineers dealing with the Trade Centers’ collapse and more than enough expert theories pointing to a conspiracy but still no smoking gun. If there was a government conspiracy, why did it take seven years for that evidence to become public? Evidence of a conspiracy would also be ample grounds for impeachment. Why wasn’t Bush impeached? It would be a direct violation of his Oath of Office. To date there is no talk of a trial before the Senate. Why?
As I pointed out, the truth about 9/11 could emerge one day. However this is still America and everyone accused of a crime is still entitled to a trial by a jury of their peers. Trials do not take place on line, on television, radio or any other part of the media. Until there is enough evidence to warrant an impeachment, I stand by my comments.
Reply to this: comment | thread
Ric,
Explain it? No porblem. Not only did I HEAR the planes hit Towers 1 and 2 at the EXACT moments they occurred, but I was one of the people who assisted in the clean up. Rivers of lava? Twisted metal? People jumping out just before the towers collapsed?I saw it all and heard it all on countless news programs. I lost a lot of friends that day and spent the next four weeks attending memorial services. New York City is my home. They were my friends. What you are pointing to is the terrile aftermath. Anyone can take the facts, arrange them in any order and then claim it was part of a conspiracy. If there was a conspiracy why was there no investigation? Why was there no impeachment? Why did it take so long for this evidence to become public? When that day comes—IF it comes—then I’ll listen. Until then, I stand by my comments.
Reply to this: comment | thread
Charles - excellent post and a great job with your measured defense in the comments above.
Having just read Walter Isaacson’s biography on Einstein, I am reminded of Einstein’s measured response to the problems of the early fifties.
First, there was the denial of Constitutional/civil rights to blacks, which Einstein empathized with: knowing personally how Jews were once similarly denied rights in his native Germany during the Nazi period.
Second, the McCarthy red scare days affected a number of his scientific colleagues. Despite being on the record opposed to any Communist efforts, the FBI had their file and certainly suspected even Einstein of having socialist sympathies. Einstein’s peers were investigated by the government in large numbers, surely denying them any number of civil rights in the process. (e.g., Oppenheimer, once the leader of America’s Manhattan Project, had his security clearance revoked [on the day before it would have expired anyways] for tenuous connections he had to Russia.)
After surviving these periods during which America violated its own Constitutional ethics, Einstein was buoyed by the way the government was built to make any losses of civil rights only temporary. At the end of his life, Einstein loved America most because of its ability to self-correct.
For whatever reason, call it Bush, call it 9/11, call it a sick mixture of the two, we have hit our national crisis. We can only hope that the constitution of our nation is enough to ensure that we can move towards a more successful path and that makes mistakes only after carefully considering every option.
Reply to this: comment | thread
Hello Charles,
Thanks for the response. I appreciate it.
There is more than enough evidence to impeach Bush and company for the “faulty” intelligence leading up to the invasion of Iraq; remember in 2005 when the Downing Street Memo surfaced (written in mid-2002, before the U.N. was even given the clearance to check for wmd’s), in which the “facts were fixed around the policy”? Meaning that the “facts” about WMD’s were being “fixed around the policy” of definitely going into Iraq.
If you’re aware of current books in the store, you’ve surely heard of Vincent Bugliosi’s book “The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder.” VB, of course, was the man who prosecuted Charles Manson. In addition to his immense legal expertise, VB has clearly done his homework on the Bush admin’s past 8 years.
So why, after the 2006 midterm victory for democrats, did Nancy Pelosi declare that “impeachment was off the table?” Cowardice? Perhaps because the “red/blue” divide is a false paradigm designed to keep Americans distracted, and that the D’s and R’s are simply opposite sides of the same coin? I, for one, am extremely skeptical that EITHER major party could produce REAL change, change which shakes up the existing status quo and unnecessary institutions.
Right after 9/11, both the govt and corporate media were operating under the shadow of fear. After such a cataclysmic event, no one wanted to risk being labeled a terrorist sympathizer or unAmerican, and indeed, some members of especially the right-wing media actively took this approach (do a youtube search on “bill o’reilly jeremy glick”).
Think about this for a second: In 2004, which was three years after 9/11, there was still enough blind patriotism by the masses, fostered by many in the corporate media, that Michael Moore was blasted by many as unAmerican and treasonous for suggesting that the government had been merely “incompetent” when it came to preventing 9/11. He never suggested an outright conspiracy. His movie came out a few months before the 9/11 commission report, and when the latter was released, Moore, in is ego, triumphantly declared on his website that “9/11 Commission Findings Confirm Facts Stated in Fahrenheit!” So, in other words, when the 9/11 Commission admitted that there had been “incompetence,” it was accepted as mainstream and true, whereas when Moore suggested the same thing a few months earlier, it was “unAmerican.”
Our mainstream media is controlled, and carefully designed never to give a fair hearing to such things outside the established reality paradigm. This would include 9/11 truth, JFK, other assassinations of the 1960’s, etc.
A few months before his death, William Colby Jr., former CIA director, said: “The CIA owns everyone of any major significance in the media.”
This is probably why you are (likely) not familiar with E. Howard Hunt’s deathbed confession in January 2007. Recorded on tape, he names names of conspirators in the JFK assassination, and how LBJ gave the approval for political gain. But it’s me who’s telling you this, not CBS and Katie Couric.
The internet is the greatest invention since the printing press.
Reply to this: comment | thread
Comments: Page 1 of 1 pages